The victory of
Fernando Lugo, an ex Catholic Bishop, in Paraguay’s presidential election reminded me of a similar story 10 years ago when we started the
reformasi in Indonesia.
At that time, the
HKBP church, which I’m a member of, was in trouble because of an intervention by the Soeharto’s regime. The church was divided between two groups that accepted and rejected the appointment of the archbishop (
ephorus) by the North Sumatra military commander. I belonged to the group who believe that the state should never interfere in the Church (
read: religious) matters, let alone appointing a bishop, who should be elected through the grand synod.
To cut the story short, a HKBP pastor, who belonged to the same group as mine, decided to get involved in politics. He believes that a nation led by tyranny must be changed through political means, which is a regime change. So, he joined Sri Bintang Pamungkas’s newly formed –and illegal by Soeharto’s law at that time—Partai Uni Demokrat (PUDI).
His action invited controversies. Since he was close to me and my family, we also got many phone calls saying that they are against his political move. They include people who were actually on the same side as us in the struggle against Soeharto.
Their main reason, if simplified, is: “A priest should only do his religious duties. Don’t get involved in politics!” That is also the same argument that
the Vatican said about Fernando Lugo now.
However, the pastor stood firm and said, “The fights against tyranny, injustice and crimes against humanity are also the task of the Church.”
So, Indonesia actually has had a “Fernando Lugo’. I believe there are many of them also in other religions. The difference between Indonesia and Paraguay is we haven’t been successful in forming a united platform and alliance to promote progressive and popular ideas. That’s why Paraguay has won, and we have not.
Continue>>